This transcript was automatically generated and may contain errors.

Social security contributions paid in another Member State, or 90% it is a complex topic, that's why I don't want to hide beyond this idea of impact assessments,

but it's really necessary to do it legally and then it's going to be politically quite an important debate,

but true, it is a response to a demand to support the EU Inc by more working time in telework.

And what would it mean and can it be done and can it really be implemented with the coordination of social security services rules that we have and that we might envisage so fully fledged. A phrase that allows us to explore.

Different options, more than 25, but I couldn't say that it's 50 or 75. It depends on who you talk to. Yeah, thank you.

Well, concluding remarks, Chair, I want to, in advance,

thank you Olof you who will be part of the negotiations with the Council.'s.

It's gonna be probably different speeds, but the faster we deliver, the better.

For SSAS and ELAB, I, I dare, I dare hope, that it's, it's, it's,

it's two pieces of initiatives that we can advance, together as swiftly as possible to prove.

In the mobility sector, what we deliver to Europeans for the skills portability, I know it is probably not here,

the discussion, or not so much here, not only here, so that I'm not going to go into detail. So speed a bit is quite important.

But beyond that, I am at your disposal and you will see probably all these Quality Jobs Act, the preparations that we will launch for the 883 2.0,

they will all come together and we will work together on this big package for mobility which is not just a fair labor mobility,

it's a, it's a bigger set of measures that we are taking.

My hope is that mobility, fairer and simpler,

will be a legacy of, of this mandate, of our mandate.

So let's work on that and thank you for all your contributions.

Thank you, thank you very much once again, Executive Vice President for being with us and for all the answers to the questions, and as we have discussed many times in this committee, there is a positive dimension to labor mobility that we want to enhance and strengthen,

and then there is also the negative dimension that we all are aware of,

and so we also have a shared a common priority in making sure that we have tools to address these issues.

I think you also hear as you are preparing the 883 version 2.0 hear the concerns in the committee because I know for EM Committee this principle of it being the country where the worker is the labor acquis that is applied to it has been a very important principle when discussing the 28 regime,

especially taking into consideration that the scope as it was proposed is not limited only to the. Startups and the innovative companies.

So we need to make sure that increased telework also is not a way to kind of circumvent the basic legal principles when it comes to labor legislation in the European Union,

but I think you also took away with you from here. The concerns addressed regarding that.

Look forward to continuing discussions later, also in connection with the Quality Jobs Act,

which we are of course very much eagerly awaiting. Thank you.